LABD vs SCHD
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LABD | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $61M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.50% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -71.57% | +27.67% | |
| 1Y Return | -89.11% | +29.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -66.00% | +16.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -48.86% | +9.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 87.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 28, 2015 | Oct 20, 2011 |
LABD vs SCHD Performance
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF (LABD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year LABD returned -89.11% while SCHD returned +29.56%. Year to date, LABD is down 71.57% versus a gain of 27.67% for SCHD.
Over three years, LABD compounded at -66.00% per year against +16.53% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -48.86% and +9.95% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.55% annualized vs -56.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LABD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 87.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for LABD and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LABD charges 1.07% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $6 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LABD currently yields 4.50% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
LABD and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LABD or SCHD?
LABD has an expense ratio of 1.07% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LABD or SCHD?
Over the past year LABD returned -89.11% vs +29.56% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), LABD annualized -56.65% vs +11.55% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LABD or SCHD?
LABD has been the more volatile fund at 87.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: LABD -100.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both LABD and SCHD?
LABD and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LABD and SCHD?
LABD and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LABD or SCHD?
LABD yields 4.50% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so LABD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.