LABD vs VTI
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LABD or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.56, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LABD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $82M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.36% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -65.15% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -83.44% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -64.94% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -47.37% | +12.36%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 87.2% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $404 | $17,908Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 28, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 28, 2015 to Sep 18, 2026 (11.3 years).
LABD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.3 years both funds cover.
LABD vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF (LABD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LABD returned -83.44% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, LABD is down 65.15% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, LABD compounded at -64.94% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -47.37% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.22% annualized vs -55.67%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LABD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 87.2% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.56. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LABD charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LABD currently yields 6.36% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3 holdings in LABD and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 89.6% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in LABD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 10 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LABD and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LABD or VTI?
LABD has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LABD or VTI?
Over the past year LABD returned -83.44% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), LABD annualized -55.67% vs +12.22% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LABD or VTI?
LABD has been the more volatile fund at 87.2% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI.
Should I hold both LABD and VTI?
LABD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.56, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LABD or VTI?
LABD yields 6.36% while VTI yields 1.03%, so LABD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LABD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.56, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.