LABD vs VTI
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LABD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $65M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.44% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -64.01% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | -88.46% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -63.06% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -47.88% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 87.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 28, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
LABD vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF (LABD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LABD returned -88.46% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, LABD is down 64.01% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, LABD compounded at -63.06% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -47.88% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -55.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LABD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 87.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for LABD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LABD charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LABD currently yields 5.44% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LABD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LABD or VTI?
LABD has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LABD or VTI?
Over the past year LABD returned -88.46% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), LABD annualized -55.91% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LABD or VTI?
LABD has been the more volatile fund at 87.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LABD -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LABD and VTI?
LABD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LABD and VTI?
LABD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LABD or VTI?
LABD yields 5.44% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LABD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.