LCDL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCDL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -91.99% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -98.71% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 100.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 21, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
LCDL vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF (LCDL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCDL returned -98.71% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, LCDL is down 91.99% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LCDL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 100.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.3% for LCDL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCDL charges 1.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCDL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LCDL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCDL or VTI?
LCDL has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LCDL or VTI?
Over the past year LCDL returned -98.71% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LCDL annualized -97.36% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LCDL or VTI?
LCDL has been the more volatile fund at 100.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LCDL -99.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LCDL and VTI?
LCDL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LCDL and VTI?
LCDL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCDL or VTI?
LCDL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.