LCDL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LCDL or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCDL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 100.4% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $128 | $14,459Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 21, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 51 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. LCDL has data through Jul 15, 2026 and VTI through Sep 4, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 22, 2025 to Jul 15, 2026 (1.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LCDL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 100.4% compared with 12.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCDL charges 1.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCDL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in LCDL and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 66.7% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 61 days apart, LCDL as of Apr 30, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in LCDL and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 2 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LCDL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCDL or VTI?
LCDL has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $112 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, LCDL or VTI?
LCDL has been the more volatile fund at 100.4% annualized versus 12.4% for VTI.
Should I hold both LCDL and VTI?
LCDL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCDL or VTI?
LCDL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LCDL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.