LDRC vs SCHD
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LDRC | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $87M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.21% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +1.05% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.30% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.2% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
LDRC vs SCHD Performance
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF (LDRC) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year LDRC returned +3.30% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, LDRC is up 1.05% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 1.2% for LDRC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.0% for LDRC and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LDRC charges 0.10% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $6 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LDRC currently yields 4.21% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
LDRC and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LDRC or SCHD?
LDRC has an expense ratio of 0.10% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LDRC or SCHD?
Over the past year LDRC returned +3.30% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LDRC annualized +4.35% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LDRC or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 1.2% for LDRC. Worst drawdown: LDRC -1.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both LDRC and SCHD?
LDRC and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LDRC and SCHD?
LDRC and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LDRC or SCHD?
LDRC yields 4.21% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so LDRC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.