LINT vs SCHD
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, LINT or SCHD?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LINT | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $27M | $119.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.31% | 2.96% |
| Holdings | 20 | 204 |
| YTD Return | +8.93% | +33.09%Best |
| 1Y Return | +30.28% | +37.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.32% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 352.8% | 16.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
LINT vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LINT vs SCHD Performance
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF (LINT) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year LINT returned +30.28% while SCHD returned +37.17%. Year to date, LINT is up 8.93% versus a gain of 33.09% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 352.8% compared with 16.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LINT charges 0.97% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $6 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LINT currently yields 3.31% against 2.96% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in LINT and 98 in SCHD, totalling 19.1% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in LINT and 98 in SCHD, against full books of 20 and 204.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LINT and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LINT or SCHD?
LINT has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LINT or SCHD?
Over the past year LINT returned +30.28% vs +37.17% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LINT or SCHD?
LINT has been the more volatile fund at 352.8% annualized versus 16.6% for SCHD.
Should I hold both LINT and SCHD?
LINT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LINT or SCHD?
LINT yields 3.31% while SCHD yields 2.96%, so LINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than LINT?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.