IVV vs LINT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF
Which is better, IVV or LINT?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LINT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.97% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $63M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.79% |
| Holdings | 508 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +13.32% | +443.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.08% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.72% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.20% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 19, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs LINT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs LINT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF (LINT) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Year to date, IVV is up 13.32% versus a gain of 443.25% for LINT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LINT charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $97 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.79% for LINT.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.7% of IVV's money is in holdings LINT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for LINT, our book for it covers 98.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 4 in LINT, against full books of 508 and 10.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in LINT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.67% | 15.46% | 14.79% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and LINT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LINT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LINT charges 0.97%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LINT?
IVV yields 1.06% while LINT yields 0.79%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LINT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.