LKOR vs VTI
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Long Corporate Bond Index Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LKOR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $30M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.92% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 832 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -5.10% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.20% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.13% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.80% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.9% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Flexshares Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
LKOR vs VTI Performance
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LKOR returned -4.20% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, LKOR is down 5.10% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, LKOR compounded at +3.13% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -3.80% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LKOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.9% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.4% for LKOR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LKOR charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LKOR currently yields 5.92% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LKOR and VTI share 1 holdings out of 3561 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LKOR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 0.03% | 0.74% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LKOR or VTI?
LKOR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LKOR or VTI?
Over the past year LKOR returned -4.20% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), LKOR annualized +2.19% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LKOR or VTI?
LKOR has been the more volatile fund at 27.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LKOR -42.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LKOR and VTI?
LKOR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LKOR and VTI?
LKOR and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3561 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LKOR or VTI?
LKOR yields 5.92% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LKOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.