LMNX vs VTI
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LMNX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.31% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -73.38% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | -45.33% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 51.6% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
LMNX vs VTI Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LMNX returned -45.33% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, LMNX is down 73.38% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LMNX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 51.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.2% for LMNX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LMNX charges 1.31% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $131 vs $3 annually, a gap of $128 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LMNX currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LMNX and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LMNX or VTI?
LMNX has an expense ratio of 1.31% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $128 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LMNX or VTI?
Over the past year LMNX returned -45.33% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), LMNX annualized -3.31% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LMNX or VTI?
LMNX has been the more volatile fund at 51.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LMNX -94.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LMNX and VTI?
LMNX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LMNX and VTI?
LMNX and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LMNX or VTI?
LMNX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.