LQDW vs VTI
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LQDW or VTI?
Investment Grade Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LQDW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $318M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 12.32% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 3,135 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -6.74% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | -6.14% | +17.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.73% | +20.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.9%Best | 14.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.2%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $10,012 | $19,351Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 22, 2022 to Sep 11, 2026 (4.1 years).
LQDW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
LQDW vs VTI Performance
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LQDW returned -6.14% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, LQDW is down 6.74% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, LQDW compounded at +0.73% per year against +20.87% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +17.47% annualized vs +0.03%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 5.9% for LQDW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for LQDW and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LQDW charges 0.34% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LQDW currently yields 12.32% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in LQDW and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 100.1% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in LQDW and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 3,135 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LQDW and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LQDW or VTI?
LQDW has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LQDW or VTI?
Over the past year LQDW returned -6.14% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LQDW annualized +0.03% vs +17.47% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LQDW or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 5.9% for LQDW. Worst drawdown: LQDW -9.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LQDW and VTI?
LQDW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LQDW or VTI?
LQDW yields 12.32% while VTI yields 1.03%, so LQDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LQDW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.