MARO vs VXUS
MARO vs VXUS
YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MARO | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $52M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 187.24% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -10.74% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -45.44% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 52.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -71.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MARO vs VXUS Performance
YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MARO returned -45.44% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, MARO is down 10.74% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MARO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 52.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.8% for MARO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MARO charges 1.00% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $5 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MARO currently yields 187.24% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MARO and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7864 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MARO or VXUS?
MARO has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MARO or VXUS?
Over the past year MARO returned -45.44% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MARO annualized -42.74% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MARO or VXUS?
MARO has been the more volatile fund at 52.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MARO -71.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MARO and VXUS?
MARO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MARO and VXUS?
MARO and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7864 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MARO or VXUS?
MARO yields 187.24% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so MARO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.