MARU vs QQQ
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MARU or QQQ?
Option Writing against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MARU | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 4 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +7.94% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.32% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.6%Best | 19.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.5%Best | -17.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $12,077 | $14,465Best |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 28, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 3, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.5 years).
MARU vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
MARU vs QQQ Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) is an ETF from AllianzIM and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MARU returned +10.32% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, MARU is up 7.94% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 8.6% for MARU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.5% for MARU and -17.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MARU charges 0.74% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $18 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MARU currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MARU and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MARU or QQQ?
MARU has an expense ratio of 0.74% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MARU or QQQ?
Over the past year MARU returned +10.32% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MARU annualized +13.41% vs +27.90% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MARU or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 8.6% for MARU. Worst drawdown: MARU -8.5% vs QQQ -17.0%.
Should I hold both MARU and QQQ?
MARU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MARU or QQQ?
MARU yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MARU?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.