MARU vs VOO
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MARU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $34M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.33% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.73% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 28, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MARU vs VOO Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MARU returned +15.73% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, MARU is up 9.33% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.8% for MARU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.5% for MARU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MARU charges 0.74% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MARU currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MARU or VOO?
MARU has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MARU or VOO?
Over the past year MARU returned +15.73% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MARU annualized +15.46% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MARU or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.8% for MARU. Worst drawdown: MARU -8.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MARU and VOO?
MARU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, MARU or VOO?
MARU yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.