MCOW vs VOO
Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCOW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 79 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.58% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.04% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MCOW vs VOO Performance
Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCOW returned +8.04% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, MCOW is up 11.58% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.1% for MCOW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MCOW charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MCOW currently yields 0.21% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MCOW and VOO share 0 holdings out of 583 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MCOW or VOO?
MCOW has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MCOW or VOO?
Over the past year MCOW returned +8.04% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MCOW or VOO?
MCOW has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MCOW -15.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MCOW and VOO?
MCOW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MCOW and VOO?
MCOW and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 583 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCOW or VOO?
MCOW yields 0.21% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.