MDYV vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MDYV or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MDYV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.8B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 299 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +9.92% | +12.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.14% | +18.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.45% | +20.62%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.49% | +11.68%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -62.6% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,030 | $17,373Best |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2005 to Sep 9, 2026 (20.8 years).
MDYV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.8 years both funds cover.
MDYV vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MDYV returned +13.14% while VTI returned +18.37%. Year to date, MDYV is up 9.92% versus a gain of 12.34% for VTI.
Over three years, MDYV compounded at +13.45% per year against +20.62% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.49% and +11.68% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.55% annualized vs +6.88%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MDYV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 15.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.6% for MDYV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MDYV charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MDYV currently yields 1.67% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 70.6% of MDYV's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of MDYV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
214 positions in common, counted across the 297 positions we hold weights for in MDYV and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 299 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MDYV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| USFDUS Foods Holding Corp | 1.22% | 0.03% | 1.19% |
| RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.19% | 0.03% | 1.16% |
| SNXSynnex Corp | 1.10% | 0.03% | 1.07% |
| WCCWesco International Inc | 1.02% | 0.02% | 1.00% |
| PFGCPerformance Food Group Co | 0.99% | 0.02% | 0.97% |
| OVVOvintiv Inc. | 0.94% | 0.02% | 0.92% |
| NLYAnnaly Capital Management Inc. | 0.93% | 0.02% | 0.91% |
| PNFPPinnacle Financial Partners In Common Stock Usd1.0 | 0.92% | 0.02% | 0.90% |
| PRCentennial Resource Development Inc/de | 0.90% | 0.02% | 0.88% |
| RBCRegal Beloit Corp | 0.82% | 0.02% | 0.80% |
70.6% of MDYV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MDYV or VTI?
MDYV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MDYV or VTI?
Over the past year MDYV returned +13.14% vs +18.37% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), MDYV annualized +6.88% vs +9.55% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MDYV or VTI?
MDYV has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 15.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MDYV -62.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MDYV and VTI?
MDYV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MDYV and VTI?
At least 70.6% of MDYV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 214 positions in common, counted across the 297 positions we hold weights for in MDYV and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MDYV or VTI?
MDYV yields 1.67% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MDYV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MDYV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.