MFSM vs VTI
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MFSM or VTI?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFSM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $103M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.63% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 412 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -0.61% | +12.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.88% | +18.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.62% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.6%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.9%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $10,332 | $12,790Best |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Sep 9, 2026 (1.8 years).
MFSM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
MFSM vs VTI Performance
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MFSM returned +1.88% while VTI returned +18.37%. Year to date, MFSM is down 0.61% versus a gain of 12.34% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 3.6% for MFSM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.9% for MFSM and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFSM charges 0.34% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFSM currently yields 3.63% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 89 holdings in MFSM and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 19.7% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in MFSM and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 412 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MFSM and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFSM or VTI?
MFSM has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MFSM or VTI?
Over the past year MFSM returned +1.88% vs +18.37% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFSM annualized +1.83% vs +14.65% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MFSM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 3.6% for MFSM. Worst drawdown: MFSM -3.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both MFSM and VTI?
MFSM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFSM or VTI?
MFSM yields 3.63% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MFSM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MFSM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.