MIG vs VTI
VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MIG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.77% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 367 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.60% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.25% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.64% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.10% | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
MIG vs VTI Performance
VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MIG returned -1.25% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, MIG is down 2.60% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, MIG compounded at +4.64% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.10% and +11.84% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.08% annualized vs +0.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.2% for MIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for MIG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MIG charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIG currently yields 4.77% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MIG or VTI?
MIG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MIG or VTI?
Over the past year MIG returned -1.25% vs +20.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MIG annualized +0.24% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MIG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.2% for MIG. Worst drawdown: MIG -21.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MIG and VTI?
MIG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MIG and VTI?
MIG and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3110 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MIG or VTI?
MIG yields 4.77% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.