MKAM vs VTI
MKAM ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MKAM or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MKAM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.63% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +6.26% | +12.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.11% | +16.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.94% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.6%Best | 13.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.0%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $13,947 | $19,184Best |
| Fund Family | MKAM ETF, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 12, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 12, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.4 years).
MKAM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
MKAM vs VTI Performance
MKAM ETF (MKAM) is an ETF from MKAM ETF, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MKAM returned +9.11% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, MKAM is up 6.26% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, MKAM compounded at +9.94% per year against +20.89% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 5.6% for MKAM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.0% for MKAM and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MKAM charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MKAM currently yields 2.63% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3 holdings in MKAM and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.9% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in MKAM and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 5 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MKAM and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MKAM or VTI?
MKAM has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MKAM or VTI?
Over the past year MKAM returned +9.11% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MKAM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 5.6% for MKAM. Worst drawdown: MKAM -5.0% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both MKAM and VTI?
MKAM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MKAM or VTI?
MKAM yields 2.63% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MKAM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MKAM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.