MKAM vs VYM
MKAM ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MKAM | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $13M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.68% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +7.22% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.50% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | MKAM ETF, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 12, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MKAM vs VYM Performance
MKAM ETF (MKAM) is a ETF from MKAM ETF, LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MKAM returned +11.50% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, MKAM is up 7.22% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, MKAM compounded at +10.23% per year against +18.60% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, MKAM has the edge at +10.88% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 5.7% for MKAM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.0% for MKAM and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MKAM charges 0.53% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $4 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MKAM currently yields 2.68% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MKAM and VYM share 0 holdings out of 562 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MKAM or VYM?
MKAM has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MKAM or VYM?
Over the past year MKAM returned +11.50% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), MKAM annualized +10.88% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MKAM or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 5.7% for MKAM. Worst drawdown: MKAM -5.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MKAM and VYM?
MKAM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MKAM and VYM?
MKAM and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 562 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MKAM or VYM?
MKAM yields 2.68% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.