MKOR vs VTI
Matthews Korea Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MKOR or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MKOR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MKOR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $143M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 56 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +77.68%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +113.34%Best | +15.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +43.45%Best | +22.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.0% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.4% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $25,996Best | $17,378 |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Matthews Asia Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 29, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2023 to Oct 1, 2026 (3.2 years).
MKOR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
MKOR vs VTI Performance
Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) is an ETF from Matthews Asia Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MKOR returned +113.34% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, MKOR is up 77.68% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, MKOR compounded at +43.45% per year against +22.50% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MKOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.0% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.4% for MKOR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MKOR charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MKOR currently yields 1.45% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 55 holdings in MKOR and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 100.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, MKOR as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in MKOR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 56 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for MKOR (97.5% of the fund), and 3 for MKOR that do not appear in VTI (1.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MKOR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MKOR or VTI?
MKOR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MKOR or VTI?
Over the past year MKOR returned +113.34% vs +15.23% for VTI, so MKOR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MKOR or VTI?
MKOR has been the more volatile fund at 36.0% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MKOR -29.4% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both MKOR and VTI?
MKOR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MKOR or VTI?
MKOR yields 1.45% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MKOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MKOR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MKOR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.