MMAR vs QQQ
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (March) ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MMAR or QQQ?
Option Writing against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MMAR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 12 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +3.06% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +24.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +29.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.00% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
MMAR vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MMAR vs QQQ Performance
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (March) ETF (MMAR) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, MMAR is up 3.06% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MMAR charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MMAR currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in MMAR and 102 in QQQ, totalling 3.7% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in MMAR and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 12 and 321.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MMAR and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MMAR or QQQ?
MMAR has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, MMAR or QQQ?
MMAR yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MMAR?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.