MMHI vs VTI
NYLIM MacKay Muni High Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MMHI or VTI?
High Yield Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MMHI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $41M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 42 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +3.22% | +11.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.19% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.49% |
| Fund Family | New York Life Investment Management LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Municipal Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
MMHI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MMHI vs VTI Performance
NYLIM MacKay Muni High Income ETF (MMHI) is an ETF from New York Life Investment Management LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, MMHI is up 3.22% versus a gain of 11.29% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MMHI charges 0.34% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MMHI currently yields 0.31% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 42 holdings in MMHI and 3,469 in VTI, totalling 44.8% and 96.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in MMHI and 3,469 in VTI, against full books of 42 and 3,542.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MMHI and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MMHI or VTI?
MMHI has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, MMHI or VTI?
MMHI yields 0.31% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MMHI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.