MMIN vs VTI
NYLI MacKay Muni Insured ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MMIN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $469M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.43% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 397 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.59% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.35% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.89% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.46% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.3% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | INDEXIQ ETF TRUST | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
MMIN vs VTI Performance
NYLI MacKay Muni Insured ETF (MMIN) is a ETF from INDEXIQ ETF TRUST and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MMIN returned +7.35% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, MMIN is up 1.59% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, MMIN compounded at +3.89% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.46% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 6.3% for MMIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for MMIN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MMIN charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MMIN currently yields 4.43% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MMIN and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2934 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MMIN or VTI?
MMIN has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MMIN or VTI?
Over the past year MMIN returned +7.35% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), MMIN annualized +1.52% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MMIN or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 6.3% for MMIN. Worst drawdown: MMIN -16.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MMIN and VTI?
MMIN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MMIN and VTI?
MMIN and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2934 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MMIN or VTI?
MMIN yields 4.43% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MMIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.