MMIN vs VXUS
MMIN vs VXUS
NYLI MacKay Muni Insured ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MMIN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $469M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.43% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 397 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.42% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.45% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.92% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.39% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | INDEXIQ ETF TRUST | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MMIN vs VXUS Performance
NYLI MacKay Muni Insured ETF (MMIN) is a ETF from INDEXIQ ETF TRUST and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MMIN returned +7.45% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, MMIN is up 1.42% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, MMIN compounded at +3.92% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +0.39% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.3% for MMIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for MMIN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MMIN charges 0.30% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $5 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MMIN currently yields 4.43% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MMIN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8012 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MMIN or VXUS?
MMIN has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MMIN or VXUS?
Over the past year MMIN returned +7.45% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), MMIN annualized +1.51% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MMIN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.3% for MMIN. Worst drawdown: MMIN -16.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MMIN and VXUS?
MMIN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MMIN and VXUS?
MMIN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8012 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MMIN or VXUS?
MMIN yields 4.43% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so MMIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.