MMT vs VOO
MFS Multimarket Income Trust vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MMT or VOO?
Diversified Sectoral Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MMT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.17% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $266M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.69% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 920 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -0.97% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.70% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.61% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.08% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.9%Best | 14.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.5% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,040 | $18,384Best |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Diversified Sectoral Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1987 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 11, 2026 (16 years).
MMT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MMT vs VOO Performance
MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MMT returned -1.70% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, MMT is down 0.97% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Over three years, MMT compounded at +8.61% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.08% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs +0.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 10.9% for MMT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.5% for MMT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MMT charges 1.17% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $117 vs $3 annually, a gap of $114 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MMT currently yields 8.69% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings MMT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MMT, our book for it covers 88.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 150 days apart, MMT as of Jan 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 547 positions we hold weights for in MMT and 505 in VOO, against full books of 920 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MMT | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 0.04% | 0.12% | 0.08% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MMT and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MMT or VOO?
MMT has an expense ratio of 1.17% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $114 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MMT or VOO?
Over the past year MMT returned -1.70% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MMT annualized +0.08% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MMT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 10.9% for MMT. Worst drawdown: MMT -47.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MMT and VOO?
MMT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MMT or VOO?
MMT yields 8.69% while VOO yields 1.04%, so MMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MMT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.