MSFO vs VTI
YieldMax Microsoft Option Income Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $100M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 42.88% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 15 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +3.94% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.82% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.65% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
MSFO vs VTI Performance
YieldMax Microsoft Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFO returned -2.82% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, MSFO is up 3.94% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, MSFO compounded at +15.65% per year against +21.17% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, MSFO has the edge at +15.65% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for MSFO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFO charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFO currently yields 42.88% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MSFO and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFO or VTI?
MSFO has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSFO or VTI?
Over the past year MSFO returned -2.82% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), MSFO annualized +15.65% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSFO or VTI?
MSFO has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MSFO -29.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MSFO and VTI?
MSFO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSFO and VTI?
MSFO and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFO or VTI?
MSFO yields 42.88% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MSFO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.