MSFO vs VOO
YieldMax Microsoft Option Income Strategy ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $100M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 42.88% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 15 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.55% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.26% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.89% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MSFO vs VOO Performance
YieldMax Microsoft Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFO returned -2.26% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, MSFO is up 4.55% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, MSFO compounded at +15.89% per year against +21.78% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, MSFO has the edge at +15.89% annualized vs +13.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for MSFO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFO charges 1.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFO currently yields 42.88% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MSFO and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFO or VOO?
MSFO has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSFO or VOO?
Over the past year MSFO returned -2.26% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), MSFO annualized +15.89% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSFO or VOO?
MSFO has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MSFO -29.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MSFO and VOO?
MSFO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSFO and VOO?
MSFO and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFO or VOO?
MSFO yields 42.88% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MSFO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.