MSMR vs VOO
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSMR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $183M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.36% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.35% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.49% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Aptus Capital Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MSMR vs VOO Performance
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) is a ETF from Aptus Capital Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSMR returned +8.35% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, MSMR is up 1.36% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, MSMR compounded at +13.49% per year against +21.47% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 10.4% for MSMR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for MSMR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSMR charges 1.06% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $3 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSMR currently yields 1.83% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MSMR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSMR or VOO?
MSMR has an expense ratio of 1.06% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSMR or VOO?
Over the past year MSMR returned +8.35% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), MSMR annualized +8.40% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSMR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 10.4% for MSMR. Worst drawdown: MSMR -14.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MSMR and VOO?
MSMR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSMR and VOO?
MSMR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSMR or VOO?
MSMR yields 1.83% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MSMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.