MSOX vs VTI
AdvisorShares MSOS Daily Leveraged ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSOX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $46M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -41.83% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -75.35% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -62.22% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 163.6% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | AdvisorShares Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 23, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
MSOX vs VTI Performance
AdvisorShares MSOS Daily Leveraged ETF (MSOX) is a ETF from AdvisorShares Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSOX returned -75.35% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, MSOX is down 41.83% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, MSOX compounded at -62.22% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -74.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSOX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 163.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.8% for MSOX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSOX charges 0.97% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSOX currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MSOX and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSOX or VTI?
MSOX has an expense ratio of 0.97% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSOX or VTI?
Over the past year MSOX returned -75.35% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MSOX annualized -74.15% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSOX or VTI?
MSOX has been the more volatile fund at 163.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MSOX -99.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MSOX and VTI?
MSOX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSOX and VTI?
MSOX and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSOX or VTI?
MSOX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.