MTYY vs VTI
GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MTYY or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MTYY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 249.17% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -35.97% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | -69.43% | +17.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.7% | 13.2%Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
MTYY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MTYY vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF (MTYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MTYY returned -69.43% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, MTYY is down 35.97% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MTYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.7% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MTYY charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MTYY currently yields 249.17% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MTYY and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MTYY or VTI?
MTYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MTYY or VTI?
Over the past year MTYY returned -69.43% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MTYY or VTI?
MTYY has been the more volatile fund at 34.7% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI.
Should I hold both MTYY and VTI?
MTYY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MTYY or VTI?
MTYY yields 249.17% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MTYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MTYY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.