MUC vs VOO
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MUC or VOO?
Municipal California against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MUC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.82% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.4B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.66% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 213 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -0.99% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.71% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.92% | +23.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.82% | +13.85%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1%Best | 14.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.9% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,230 | $19,128Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal California | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 27, 1998 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 21, 2026 (16 years).
MUC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MUC vs VOO Performance
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc (MUC) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MUC returned -0.71% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, MUC is down 0.99% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, MUC compounded at +5.92% per year against +23.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -3.82% and +13.85% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs -0.46%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.1% for MUC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.9% for MUC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MUC charges 2.82% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $282 vs $3 annually, a gap of $279 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MUC currently yields 5.66% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 84 holdings in MUC and 494 in VOO, totalling 82.2% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 181 days apart, MUC as of Jan 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in MUC and 494 in VOO, against full books of 213 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MUC and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MUC or VOO?
MUC has an expense ratio of 2.82% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $279 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MUC or VOO?
Over the past year MUC returned -0.71% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MUC annualized -0.46% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MUC or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.1% for MUC. Worst drawdown: MUC -40.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MUC and VOO?
MUC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MUC or VOO?
MUC yields 5.66% while VOO yields 1.04%, so MUC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MUC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.