NASA vs QQQ
Tema Space Innovators ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, NASA or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NASA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 35 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -2.52% | +21.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.89% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +28.80% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.67% |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NASA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NASA vs QQQ Performance
Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, NASA is down 2.52% versus a gain of 21.71% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NASA charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NASA currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings NASA also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NASA, our book for it covers 82.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and NASA share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in NASA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 35 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NASA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NASA or QQQ?
NASA has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NASA and QQQ?
At least 1.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings NASA also owns. Our book for NASA is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in NASA and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, NASA or QQQ?
NASA yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than NASA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.