NASA vs VTI
Tema Space Innovators ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NASA or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NASA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 36 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -0.70% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NASA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NASA vs VTI Performance
Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, NASA is down 0.70% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NASA charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NASA currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings NASA also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NASA, our book for it covers 81.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
19 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in NASA and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 36 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NASA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RKLBRocket Lab Corp | 9.54% | 0.05% | 9.49% |
| ASTSAst Spacemobile Inc Class A | 6.83% | 0.02% | 6.81% |
| VSATViasat Inc | 5.74% | 0.01% | 5.73% |
| FLYFirefly Aerospace Inc | 3.85% | 0.00% | 3.85% |
| VOYGVoyager Technologies Inc | 3.53% | 0.00% | 3.53% |
| LUNRIntuitive Machines Inc A | 3.48% | 0.00% | 3.48% |
| BKSYBlacksky Technology, Inc. | 2.27% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 1.94% | 0.08% | 1.86% |
| SATLSatellogic, Inc., Class A | 1.85% | 0.00% | 1.85% |
| PLPLANET LABS PBC | 1.69% | 0.01% | 1.68% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NASA and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NASA or VTI?
NASA has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, NASA or VTI?
NASA yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NASA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.