NATO vs QQQ

NATO vs QQQ

Which is better, NATO or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NATO led over the full window, QQQ over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.8%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNATOQQQ
Expense Ratio0.35%0.18%Best
AUM$98M$483.5B
Dividend Yield0.43%0.44%
Holdings94107
YTD Return-1.79%+16.87%Best
1Y Return+2.98%+22.98%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.98%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.39%
Volatility (annualized)19.1%18.9%Best
Max Drawdown-16.0%Best-22.8%
$10,000 over 1.9 years$15,141Best$14,573
Top 10 Weight60.8%46.5%Best
Fund FamilyThemes ETFsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionOct 10, 2024Mar 10, 1999

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.9 years).

NATO vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

NATO vs QQQ Performance

Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) is an ETF from Themes ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NATO returned +2.98% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, NATO is down 1.79% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NATO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 18.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for NATO and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NATO charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NATO currently yields 0.43% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

NATO already in QQQ7.4%
QQQ already in NATO0.8%

7.4% of NATO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings NATO also owns.

NATO and QQQ share little of their money.

3 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in NATO and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 94 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 92 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for NATO (96.3% of the fund), and 54 for NATO that do not appear in QQQ (56.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NATOWeight in QQQDifference
HONHoneywell International Inc3.23%0.35%2.88%
RKLBRocket Lab Usa Inc2.14%0.19%1.95%
AXONAxon Enterprise Inc2.03%0.22%1.81%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NATO and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NATOQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NATO or QQQ?

NATO has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NATO or QQQ?

Over the past year NATO returned +2.98% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NATO annualized +24.40% vs +21.92% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NATO or QQQ?

NATO has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 18.9% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: NATO -16.0% vs QQQ -22.8%.

Should I hold both NATO and QQQ?

NATO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between NATO and QQQ?

7.4% of NATO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.8% of QQQ's is in holdings NATO also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in NATO and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, NATO or QQQ?

NATO yields 0.43% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than NATO?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NATO led over the full window, QQQ over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.