NAUG vs VOO

NAUG vs VOO

Which is better, NAUG or VOO?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNAUGVOO
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%Best
AUM$67M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings12509
YTD Return+11.71%+12.37%Best
1Y Return+14.19%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Volatility (annualized)7.7%Best12.4%
Max Drawdown-12.9%Best-18.7%
$10,000 over 2.1 years$13,647$14,338Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 31, 2024Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.1 years).

NAUG vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.

NAUG vs VOO Performance

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - August (NAUG) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NAUG returned +14.19% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, NAUG is up 11.71% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 7.7% for NAUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.9% for NAUG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NAUG charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NAUG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NAUG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NAUGVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NAUG or VOO?

NAUG has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NAUG or VOO?

Over the past year NAUG returned +14.19% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NAUG annualized +15.96% vs +18.72% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NAUG or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 7.7% for NAUG. Worst drawdown: NAUG -12.9% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both NAUG and VOO?

NAUG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NAUG or VOO?

NAUG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than NAUG?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.