NBIE vs VYM
Neuberger International Core Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NBIE or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NBIE is less concentrated, with 18.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBIE | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $249M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 302 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +7.72% | +11.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.24% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.9%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 6, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
NBIE vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NBIE vs VYM Performance
Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, NBIE is up 7.72% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBIE charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBIE currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 241 holdings in NBIE and 557 in VYM, totalling 99.9% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 241 positions we hold weights for in NBIE and 557 in VYM, against full books of 302 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for NBIE (97.1% of the fund), and 5 for NBIE that do not appear in VYM (3.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NBIE and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBIE or VYM?
NBIE has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBIE or VYM?
NBIE yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NBIE?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NBIE is less concentrated, with 18.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.