NBIG vs QQQ
Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, NBIG or QQQ?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBIG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $69M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 7 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +123.99%Best | +17.95% |
| 1Y Return | -3.26% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NBIG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NBIG vs QQQ Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NBIG returned -3.26% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, NBIG is up 123.99% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBIG charges 0.76% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $18 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBIG currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings NBIG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NBIG, our book for it covers 60.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in NBIG and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 7 and 107.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NBIG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| YNDXYandex Nv Ord Eur.01 Cl A Nasdaq Stock Exchange | 50.91% | 0.21% | 50.70% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NBIG and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBIG or QQQ?
NBIG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NBIG or QQQ?
Over the past year NBIG returned -3.26% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBIG or QQQ?
NBIG yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than NBIG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.