NEA vs VOO
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NEA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.53% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.11% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,108 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.50% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.43% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.38% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.78% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 21, 2002 | Sep 7, 2010 |
NEA vs VOO Performance
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) is a ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NEA returned +11.43% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, NEA is up 1.50% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, NEA compounded at +9.38% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.78% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +0.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.1% for NEA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.1% for NEA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NEA charges 3.53% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $353 vs $3 annually, a gap of $350 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NEA currently yields 7.11% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
NEA and VOO share 0 holdings out of 910 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NEA or VOO?
NEA has an expense ratio of 3.53% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $350 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NEA or VOO?
Over the past year NEA returned +11.43% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), NEA annualized +0.15% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NEA or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.1% for NEA. Worst drawdown: NEA -48.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NEA and VOO?
NEA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NEA and VOO?
NEA and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 910 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NEA or VOO?
NEA yields 7.11% while VOO yields 1.09%, so NEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.