NPV vs VXUS
NPV vs VXUS
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NPV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.05% | |
| AUM | - | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.86% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 187 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +2.59% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.69% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.08% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.19% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 18, 1993 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NPV vs VXUS Performance
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) is a ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NPV returned +6.69% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, NPV is up 2.59% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, NPV compounded at +7.08% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -3.19% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +0.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.6% for NPV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.7% for NPV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
NPV and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7921 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, NPV or VXUS?
Over the past year NPV returned +6.69% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), NPV annualized +0.27% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NPV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.6% for NPV. Worst drawdown: NPV -52.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NPV and VXUS?
NPV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NPV and VXUS?
NPV and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7921 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NPV or VXUS?
NPV yields 6.86% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so NPV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.