NUIB vs PAB
Nuveen Impact Bond ETF vs PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF
Which is better, NUIB or PAB?
PAB costs less.
PAB has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUIB | PAB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.19%Best |
| AUM | $45M | $98M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 5.50% |
| Holdings | 58 | 466 |
| YTD Return | -0.09%Best | -1.59% |
| 1Y Return | - | -1.69% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.31% |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2026 | Apr 12, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
NUIB vs PAB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NUIB vs PAB Performance
Nuveen Impact Bond ETF (NUIB) is an ETF from Nuveen and PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Year to date, NUIB is down 0.09% versus a loss of 1.59% for PAB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUIB charges 0.37% per year while PAB charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $19 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUIB currently yields 0.00% against 5.50% for PAB.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 58 holdings in NUIB and 301 in PAB, totalling 64.0% and 64.9% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in NUIB and 301 in PAB, against full books of 58 and 466.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUIB | Weight in PAB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KPERM 2.81 06/01/41 | 1.09% | 0.05% | 1.04% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NUIB and PAB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUIB or PAB?
NUIB has an expense ratio of 0.37% while PAB charges 0.19%. PAB is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUIB or PAB?
NUIB yields 0.00% while PAB yields 5.50%, so PAB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PAB better than NUIB?
PAB has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.