NVBU vs VTI
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NVBU or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVBU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +7.47% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.61% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.0%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,413 | $13,638Best |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.9 years).
NVBU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
NVBU vs VTI Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) is an ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVBU returned +10.61% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, NVBU is up 7.47% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 8.7% for NVBU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for NVBU and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVBU charges 0.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVBU currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NVBU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVBU or VTI?
NVBU has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NVBU or VTI?
Over the past year NVBU returned +10.61% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NVBU annualized +12.05% vs +17.74% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NVBU or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 8.7% for NVBU. Worst drawdown: NVBU -12.0% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both NVBU and VTI?
NVBU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVBU or VTI?
NVBU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NVBU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.