NVBW vs SCHD

NVBW vs SCHD

Which is better, NVBW or SCHD?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: SCHD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNVBWSCHD
Expense Ratio0.74%0.06%Best
AUM$96M$112.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%3.00%
Holdings5103
YTD Return+8.31%+23.68%Best
1Y Return+10.32%+28.36%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+9.78%+16.20%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.07%
Volatility (annualized)5.6%Best13.3%
Max Drawdown-8.4%Best-16.1%
$10,000 over 3.9 years$14,636$15,694Best
Fund FamilyAllianzIMCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 31, 2022Oct 20, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2022 to Sep 22, 2026 (3.9 years).

NVBW vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.

NVBW vs SCHD Performance

AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) is an ETF from AllianzIM and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NVBW returned +10.32% while SCHD returned +28.36%. Year to date, NVBW is up 8.31% versus a gain of 23.68% for SCHD.

Over three years, NVBW compounded at +9.78% per year against +16.20% for SCHD. Across the full 4-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +12.25% annualized vs +10.26%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 5.6% for NVBW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for NVBW and -16.1% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NVBW charges 0.74% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $6 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVBW currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NVBW and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NVBWSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NVBW or SCHD?

NVBW has an expense ratio of 0.74% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $68 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NVBW or SCHD?

Over the past year NVBW returned +10.32% vs +28.36% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NVBW annualized +10.26% vs +12.25% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NVBW or SCHD?

SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 5.6% for NVBW. Worst drawdown: NVBW -8.4% vs SCHD -16.1%.

Should I hold both NVBW and SCHD?

NVBW and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NVBW or SCHD?

NVBW yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than NVBW?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.