NVBW vs VYM

NVBW vs VYM

Which is better, NVBW or VYM?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNVBWVYM
Expense Ratio0.74%0.04%Best
AUM$96M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings5613
YTD Return+7.72%+11.35%Best
1Y Return+9.84%+15.34%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+8.90%+17.22%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.30%
Volatility (annualized)5.6%Best11.5%
Max Drawdown-8.4%Best-14.5%
$10,000 over 3.9 years$14,569$16,658Best
Fund FamilyAllianzIMVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 31, 2022Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.9 years).

NVBW vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.

NVBW vs VYM Performance

AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) is an ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVBW returned +9.84% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, NVBW is up 7.72% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.

Over three years, NVBW compounded at +8.90% per year against +17.22% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +13.98% annualized vs +10.13%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.5% compared with 5.6% for NVBW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for NVBW and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NVBW charges 0.74% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $4 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVBW currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NVBW and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NVBWVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NVBW or VYM?

NVBW has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NVBW or VYM?

Over the past year NVBW returned +9.84% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NVBW annualized +10.13% vs +13.98% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NVBW or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 11.5% annualized versus 5.6% for NVBW. Worst drawdown: NVBW -8.4% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both NVBW and VYM?

NVBW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NVBW or VYM?

NVBW yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than NVBW?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.