NVDB vs VTI

NVDB vs VTI

Which is better, NVDB or VTI?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. NVDB led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: NVDB

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNVDBVTI
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$8M$666.9B
Dividend Yield1.38%1.03%
Holdings33,543
YTD Return+14.42%Best+12.30%
1Y Return+21.42%Best+16.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Volatility (annualized)54.5%13.1%Best
Max Drawdown-42.9%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1 years$11,883Best$11,762
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 8, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 10, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1 years).

NVDB vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.

NVDB vs VTI Performance

ProShares Ultra NVDA ETF (NVDB) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVDB returned +21.42% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, NVDB is up 14.42% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NVDB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 54.5% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.9% for NVDB and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NVDB charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVDB currently yields 1.38% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NVDB and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NVDBVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NVDB or VTI?

NVDB has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NVDB or VTI?

Over the past year NVDB returned +21.42% vs +16.08% for VTI, so NVDB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NVDB annualized +18.83% vs +17.62% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NVDB or VTI?

NVDB has been the more volatile fund at 54.5% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NVDB -42.9% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both NVDB and VTI?

NVDB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NVDB or VTI?

NVDB yields 1.38% while VTI yields 1.03%, so NVDB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than NVDB?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. NVDB led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.