NVOH vs VTI
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVOH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.24% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -6.50% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.98% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 50.2% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ADRH | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
NVOH vs VTI Performance
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged (NVOH) is a ETF from ADRH and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVOH returned -1.98% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, NVOH is down 6.50% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVOH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 50.2% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.6% for NVOH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVOH charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVOH currently yields 7.24% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NVOH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVOH or VTI?
NVOH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NVOH or VTI?
Over the past year NVOH returned -1.98% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NVOH annualized -31.33% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NVOH or VTI?
NVOH has been the more volatile fund at 50.2% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NVOH -61.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NVOH and VTI?
NVOH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NVOH and VTI?
NVOH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVOH or VTI?
NVOH yields 7.24% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NVOH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.