NVOH vs VXUS
NVOH vs VXUS
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVOH | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $4M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.24% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -5.90% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.52% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 50.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ADRH | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NVOH vs VXUS Performance
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged (NVOH) is a ETF from ADRH and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVOH returned +2.52% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, NVOH is down 5.90% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVOH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 50.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.6% for NVOH and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVOH charges 0.19% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $5 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVOH currently yields 7.24% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NVOH and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVOH or VXUS?
NVOH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NVOH or VXUS?
Over the past year NVOH returned +2.52% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NVOH annualized -31.32% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NVOH or VXUS?
NVOH has been the more volatile fund at 50.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NVOH -61.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NVOH and VXUS?
NVOH and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NVOH and VXUS?
NVOH and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVOH or VXUS?
NVOH yields 7.24% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so NVOH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.