PATN vs SPGM
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2,985 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | SPGM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $234M | $1.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 1.81% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 2,985 | |
| YTD Return | +30.11% | +14.45% | |
| 1Y Return | +51.30% | +25.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.00% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8% | -34.0% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | Feb 27, 2012 |
PATN vs SPGM Performance
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year PATN returned +51.30% while SPGM returned +25.63%. Year to date, PATN is up 30.11% versus a gain of 14.45% for SPGM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 13.6% for SPGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for PATN and -34.0% for SPGM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PATN charges 0.65% per year while SPGM charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $9 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PATN currently yields 1.67% against 1.81% for SPGM.
Holdings Overlap
PATN and SPGM share 52 holdings out of 2895 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PATN or SPGM?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PATN or SPGM?
Over the past year PATN returned +51.30% vs +25.63% for SPGM, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PATN annualized +37.49% vs +9.87% for SPGM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PATN or SPGM?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 13.6% for SPGM. Worst drawdown: PATN -16.8% vs SPGM -34.0%.
Should I hold both PATN and SPGM?
PATN and SPGM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PATN and SPGM?
PATN and SPGM share 52 common holdings with a 4.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2895 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PATN or SPGM?
PATN yields 1.67% while SPGM yields 1.81%, so SPGM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.