PATN vs TYLG
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | TYLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $234M | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 8.89% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 78 | |
| YTD Return | +30.11% | +21.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +51.30% | +35.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 15.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8% | -24.5% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | Nov 21, 2022 |
PATN vs TYLG Performance
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year PATN returned +51.30% while TYLG returned +35.64%. Year to date, PATN is up 30.11% versus a gain of 21.18% for TYLG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 15.8% for TYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for PATN and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PATN charges 0.65% per year while TYLG charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $60 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PATN currently yields 1.67% against 8.89% for TYLG.
Holdings Overlap
PATN and TYLG share 0 holdings out of 175 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PATN or TYLG?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while TYLG charges 0.60%. TYLG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PATN or TYLG?
Over the past year PATN returned +51.30% vs +35.64% for TYLG, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PATN annualized +37.49% vs +25.12% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PATN or TYLG?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 15.8% for TYLG. Worst drawdown: PATN -16.8% vs TYLG -24.5%.
Should I hold both PATN and TYLG?
PATN and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PATN and TYLG?
PATN and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 175 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PATN or TYLG?
PATN yields 1.67% while TYLG yields 8.89%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.