PATN vs VGI
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs Virtus Global Multi-Sector Income Fund
Quick Verdict
PATN has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VGI offers more diversification with 434 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PATN | VGI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 1.74% | |
| AUM | $194M | $88M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 11.98% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 646 | |
| YTD Return | +30.58% | +1.61% | |
| 1Y Return | +51.85% | +5.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.18% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +2.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8% | -63.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Virtus Investment Partners | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | Feb 23, 2012 |
PATN vs VGI Performance
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Virtus Global Multi-Sector Income Fund (VGI) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past year PATN returned +51.85% while VGI returned +5.13%. Year to date, PATN is up 30.58% versus a gain of 1.61% for VGI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 14.2% for VGI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for PATN and -63.3% for VGI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PATN charges 0.65% per year while VGI charges 1.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $174 annually, a gap of $109 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PATN currently yields 1.59% against 11.98% for VGI.
Holdings Overlap
PATN and VGI share 0 holdings out of 535 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PATN or VGI?
PATN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VGI charges 1.74%. PATN is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $109 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PATN or VGI?
Over the past year PATN returned +51.85% vs +5.13% for VGI, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PATN annualized +38.32% vs -2.37% for VGI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PATN or VGI?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 14.2% for VGI. Worst drawdown: PATN -16.8% vs VGI -63.3%.
Should I hold both PATN and VGI?
PATN and VGI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PATN and VGI?
PATN and VGI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 535 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PATN or VGI?
PATN yields 1.59% while VGI yields 11.98%, so VGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.