PBW vs SCHD
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. PBW delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBW | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $386M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 71 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +7.78% | +25.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +45.20% | +31.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.62% | +15.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -14.51% | +9.61% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -89.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 3, 2005 | Oct 20, 2011 |
PBW vs SCHD Performance
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PBW returned +45.20% while SCHD returned +31.06%. Year to date, PBW is up 7.78% versus a gain of 25.58% for SCHD.
Over three years, PBW compounded at -1.62% per year against +15.55% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -14.51% and +9.61% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.46% annualized vs -3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -89.7% for PBW and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBW charges 0.64% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $6 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBW currently yields 1.21% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
PBW and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 169 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBW or SCHD?
PBW has an expense ratio of 0.64% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PBW or SCHD?
Over the past year PBW returned +45.20% vs +31.06% for SCHD, so PBW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), PBW annualized -3.21% vs +11.46% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PBW or SCHD?
PBW has been the more volatile fund at 35.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: PBW -89.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both PBW and SCHD?
PBW and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PBW and SCHD?
PBW and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 169 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBW or SCHD?
PBW yields 1.21% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.