PBW vs VXUS
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, PBW or VXUS?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBW | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $380M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 70 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -5.20% | +12.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.21% | +19.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.17% | +20.14%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -15.79% | +8.87%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.5% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -89.1% | -39.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $4,235 | $15,295Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 3, 2005 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 28, 2011 to Sep 23, 2026 (15.7 years).
PBW vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.7 years both funds cover.
PBW vs VXUS Performance
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PBW returned +8.21% while VXUS returned +19.97%. Year to date, PBW is down 5.20% versus a gain of 12.88% for VXUS.
Over three years, PBW compounded at +0.17% per year against +20.14% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -15.79% and +8.87% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.72% annualized vs -2.65%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.5% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -89.1% for PBW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBW charges 0.64% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $5 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBW currently yields 1.49% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.5% of PBW's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
PBW and VXUS share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in PBW and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 70 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PBW | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BEPC:CABrookfield Renewable Corporation Class A Subordinate Voting Shares | 1.51% | 0.01% | 1.50% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBW and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBW or VXUS?
PBW has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PBW or VXUS?
Over the past year PBW returned +8.21% vs +19.97% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PBW annualized -2.65% vs +4.72% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBW or VXUS?
PBW has been the more volatile fund at 35.5% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PBW -89.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PBW and VXUS?
PBW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PBW and VXUS?
At least 1.5% of PBW's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in PBW and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBW or VXUS?
PBW yields 1.49% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than PBW?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.